| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i7-10610U


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.8 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
23.1k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
20k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.61k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
8.94k (x0.77)
TOTAL
81.64k
56.65k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
73.36k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
68.28k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
13.73k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.62k (x1.05)
TOTAL
297.46k
162k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4