Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
810f10
Core
Alder Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
3.8k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
17.38k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
5.17k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
3.16k (x0.24)
TOTAL
51.61k
29.52k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
15.28k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
76.44k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
27.48k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
3.02k (x0.6)
TOTAL
172.07k
122.2k (x0.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
13.95k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
20.7k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
5.33k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
3.03k (x0.23)
TOTAL
74.99k
43.01k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
58.56k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
92.95k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
28.55k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
2.98k (x0.51)
TOTAL
288.36k
183.04k (x0.63)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
13.04k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
22.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
5.37k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
3.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
73.15k
44.15k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
56.49k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
100.74k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
28.21k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
3.04k (x0.53)
TOTAL
301.58k
188.49k (x0.62)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
14.2k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
23.23k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
5.35k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
5.18k (x0.45)
TOTAL
81.64k
47.96k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
58.24k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
105.72k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
28.73k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
5.59k (x0.89)
TOTAL
297.46k
198.27k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4