| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 3.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
13.02k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
20.56k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.81k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
5.43k (x0.47)
TOTAL
81.64k
43.82k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-1235U

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
27.29k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
49.37k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
13.57k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
5.61k (x0.89)
TOTAL
297.46k
95.84k (x0.32)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4