Core i5-1235U vs A9 9425
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 7.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 7.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
670f00
Core
Alder Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
10/12
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
11.23k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
14.7k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
3.15k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
2.24k (x0.19)
TOTAL
81.64k
31.31k (x0.38)
Multithread
i5-1235U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
16.58k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
17.84k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
5.09k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
2.23k (x0.35)
TOTAL
297.46k
41.73k (x0.14)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4