Core i3-1215U vs i5-8300H
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
23.6k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
21.72k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
4.61k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
6.8k (x0.66)
TOTAL
80.34k
56.72k (x0.71)
Multithread
i3-1215U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
79.12k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
81.27k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
17.46k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
4.62k (x0.48)
TOTAL
185.6k
182.47k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4