Core i3-1215U vs i5-7400T
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
906e9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
49.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
163.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
19.7k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
17.29k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
4.07k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
8.1k (x0.79)
TOTAL
80.34k
49.16k (x0.61)
Multithread
i3-1215U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
75.27k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
66.24k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
13.93k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
7.95k (x0.82)
TOTAL
185.6k
163.4k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
2151 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
1893 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
398 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
4669 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5764 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
2700 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
16388 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4