| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-10500


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
4.52k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
18.52k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
5.58k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
14.2k (x1.43)
TOTAL
43.67k
42.82k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
25.26k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
120.48k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
38.12k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
7.68k (x0.89)
TOTAL
105.05k
191.54k (x1.82)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
16.3k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
23.22k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
6.22k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
14.05k (x1.69)
TOTAL
61.26k
59.79k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
92.61k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
147.68k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
40.71k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
7.78k (x0.55)
TOTAL
148.26k
288.77k (x1.95)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
16.33k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
24.73k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
5.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
13.64k (x1.69)
TOTAL
53.83k
60.69k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
91.64k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
158.71k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
39.84k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
7.76k (x0.62)
TOTAL
129.6k
297.94k (x2.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
28.73k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
26.01k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
6.08k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
14.46k (x1.4)
TOTAL
80.34k
75.27k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
172.66k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
167.57k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
39.45k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
8.31k (x0.86)
TOTAL
185.6k
387.99k (x2.09)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
5969 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4