| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
706e5
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
4.05k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
15.29k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
9.04k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
10.54k (x1.06)
TOTAL
43.67k
38.92k (x0.89)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
9.05k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
33.88k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
15.34k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
6.74k (x0.78)
TOTAL
105.05k
65.01k (x0.62)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
7.07k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
10.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
5.27k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
5.66k (x0.68)
TOTAL
61.26k
28.56k (x0.47)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
25.28k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
37.48k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
17.77k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
6.92k (x0.49)
TOTAL
148.26k
87.45k (x0.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
13.9k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
20.13k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
9.41k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
10.59k (x1.31)
TOTAL
53.83k
54.03k (x1)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
55.4k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
59.01k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
22.83k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
6.7k (x0.54)
TOTAL
129.6k
143.94k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
25.53k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
19.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
9.31k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
10.81k (x1.05)
TOTAL
80.34k
65.64k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
58.46k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
57.31k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
20.1k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
6.81k (x0.71)
TOTAL
185.6k
142.69k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4