| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i3-9100T


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
906eb
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
3.79k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
15.65k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
4.59k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
7.78k (x0.78)
TOTAL
43.67k
31.81k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
13.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
57.83k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
17.03k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
4.35k (x0.51)
TOTAL
105.05k
93.18k (x0.89)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
13.74k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
19.7k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
4.86k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
8.61k (x1.03)
TOTAL
61.26k
46.91k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
50.5k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
72.58k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
18.09k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
4.28k (x0.3)
TOTAL
148.26k
145.45k (x0.98)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
13.6k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
20.58k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
4.76k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
8.8k (x1.09)
TOTAL
53.83k
47.74k (x0.89)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
50.18k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
75.99k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
17.66k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
4.12k (x0.33)
TOTAL
129.6k
147.95k (x1.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
24.89k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
21.82k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
4.83k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
8.63k (x0.84)
TOTAL
80.34k
60.16k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
89.4k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
81.19k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
18.06k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
4.24k (x0.44)
TOTAL
185.6k
192.88k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4