| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i3-10110U


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
4.26k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
15.48k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
4.94k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
4.31k (x0.43)
TOTAL
43.67k
28.98k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
7.41k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
29.18k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
10.26k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
3.27k (x0.38)
TOTAL
105.05k
50.13k (x0.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
14.3k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
20.09k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
5.23k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
4.24k (x0.51)
TOTAL
61.26k
43.87k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
25.51k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
41.33k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
10.81k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
3.21k (x0.23)
TOTAL
148.26k
80.85k (x0.55)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
14.25k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
21.55k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
5.16k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
4.26k (x0.53)
TOTAL
53.83k
45.22k (x0.84)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
26.15k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
44.03k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
10.71k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
3.28k (x0.26)
TOTAL
129.6k
84.17k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
24.6k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
22.32k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
5.02k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
4.7k (x0.46)
TOTAL
80.34k
56.64k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
47.98k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
44.28k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
10.33k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
3.98k (x0.41)
TOTAL
185.6k
106.58k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4