| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
3.41k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
15.96k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
4.69k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
17.42k (x1.75)
TOTAL
43.67k
41.47k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-1215U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
20.88k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
110.37k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
39.25k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
6.66k (x0.78)
TOTAL
105.05k
177.16k (x1.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
13.76k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
23.03k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
5.12k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
15.23k (x1.48)
TOTAL
80.34k
57.13k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-1215U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
83.23k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
161.06k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
40.52k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
6.73k (x0.7)
TOTAL
185.6k
291.53k (x1.57)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4