| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100F vs E5-2620 v3


Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
357.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
18.64k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
10.55k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
4.12k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
2.54k (x0.19)
TOTAL
88.81k
35.86k (x0.4)

Multithread

i3-12100F

E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
181.66k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
122.09k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
47.02k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
7.22k (x0.43)
TOTAL
340.49k
357.99k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i3-12100F
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
4212 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4