| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100F vs i9-9900KF


Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
592.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
33.03k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
29.52k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
6.55k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
15.45k (x1.14)
TOTAL
88.81k
84.54k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-12100F

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
276.22k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
250.61k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
57.2k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
8.84k (x0.53)
TOTAL
340.49k
592.86k (x1.74)

Performance/W
i3-12100F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
6241 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4