Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
16.59k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
23.51k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
9.38k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
7.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
88.81k
57.47k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-12100F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
152.43k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
195.79k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
83.2k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
5.38k (x0.32)
TOTAL
340.49k
436.8k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4