Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a20f12
Core
Alder Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
22.73k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
24.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
11.44k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
25.03k (x1.85)
TOTAL
88.81k
83.79k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-12100F
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
134.28k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
178.56k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
78.16k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
38.26k (x2.29)
TOTAL
340.49k
429.25k (x1.26)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4