| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
15.48k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
22.91k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
7.1k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
21.11k (x1.56)
TOTAL
88.81k
66.61k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-12100F

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
90.39k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
139.1k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
53.2k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
90.92k (x5.45)
TOTAL
340.49k
373.61k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-12100F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4