Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
14.58k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
23.98k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
5.35k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
6.34k (x0.47)
TOTAL
88.81k
50.25k (x0.57)
Multithread
i3-12100F
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
57.37k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
107.03k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
28.9k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
7.05k (x0.42)
TOTAL
340.49k
200.34k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4