| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100F vs i9-11900H


Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806d1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
33.38k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
27.12k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
11.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
17k (x1.26)
TOTAL
88.81k
89.19k (x1)

Multithread

i3-12100F

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
249.83k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
237.26k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
84.18k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
13.2k (x0.79)
TOTAL
340.49k
584.47k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i3-12100F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4