Core i9-11900K vs i9-9900K
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.4 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.4 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
906ec
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
545.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
33.62k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
30.02k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
7.17k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
15.43k (x0.71)
TOTAL
101.11k
86.24k (x0.85)
Multithread
i9-11900K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
248.93k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
224.43k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
53.39k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
18.54k (x1.85)
TOTAL
748.02k
545.3k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
5740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4