Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 788.9 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.4 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 788.9 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.4 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a20f12
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
106.41k points
89.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
788.94k points
558.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.06k
24.3k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
26.46k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.5k
12.18k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.3k
26.58k (x1.14)
TOTAL
106.41k
89.53k (x0.84)
Multithread
i9-11900K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
327.93k
187.4k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
329.16k
246.12k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
118.88k
113.16k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.98k
11.74k (x0.9)
TOTAL
788.94k
558.41k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2623 points/W
1785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2633 points/W
2344 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
951 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
6312 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7182 points/GHz
5170 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
5631 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4397 points/GHz
5656 points/GHz
TOTAL
20077 points/GHz
19049 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4