Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
870f10
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
17.1k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
26.59k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
8.91k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
23.21k (x1.06)
TOTAL
101.11k
75.81k (x0.75)
Multithread
i9-11900K
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
172.04k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
214.03k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
97.1k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
14.57k (x1.45)
TOTAL
748.02k
497.74k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4