| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i3-12100F


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 2.2 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
90675
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
125 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
39.54k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
23.79k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
11.96k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
13.52k (x0.62)
TOTAL
101.11k
88.81k (x0.88)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
148k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
123.08k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
52.73k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
16.67k (x1.66)
TOTAL
748.02k
340.49k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4