Core i9-11900H vs i7-9700K
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
906ec
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
29.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
25.61k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
5.86k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
12.86k (x0.76)
TOTAL
89.19k
73.62k (x0.83)
Multithread
i9-11900H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
217.77k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
190.46k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
40.48k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
11.31k (x0.86)
TOTAL
584.47k
460.02k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4