Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 3950X
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3950X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 3950X gets 959.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 3950X gets 959.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
959.77k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
16.49k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
26.16k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
7.9k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
22.4k (x1.32)
TOTAL
89.19k
72.95k (x0.82)
Multithread
i9-11900H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
334.49k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
423.74k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
187.85k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
13.69k (x1.04)
TOTAL
584.47k
959.77k (x1.64)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
3186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
4036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
1789 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
130 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
9141 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
3509 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1681 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
4765 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
15522 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4