Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
20.37k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
22.52k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
10.18k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
21.49k (x1.26)
TOTAL
89.19k
74.56k (x0.84)
Multithread
i9-11900H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
144.01k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
191.86k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
84.53k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
6.5k (x0.49)
TOTAL
584.47k
426.9k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4