Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.3 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.3 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
16.59k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
23.51k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
9.38k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
7.98k (x0.47)
TOTAL
89.19k
57.47k (x0.64)
Multithread
i9-11900H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
152.43k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
195.79k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
83.2k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
5.38k (x0.41)
TOTAL
584.47k
436.8k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4