Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
17.57k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
27.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
9.35k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
23.9k (x1.41)
TOTAL
89.19k
78.2k (x0.88)
Multithread
i9-11900H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
176.08k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
219.88k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
100k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.93k (x0.98)
TOTAL
584.47k
508.89k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4