| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.3 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
433.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
15.61k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
26.08k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
5.84k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
18.34k (x1.08)
TOTAL
89.19k
65.87k (x0.74)

Multithread

i9-11900H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
123.33k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
240.46k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
61.23k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
8.17k (x0.62)
TOTAL
584.47k
433.19k (x0.74)

Performance/W
i9-11900H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4