| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.8 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
15.75k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
26.29k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
5.91k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
18.48k (x1.09)
TOTAL
89.19k
66.44k (x0.74)

Multithread

i9-11900H

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
94.49k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
182.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
45.95k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
10.15k (x0.77)
TOTAL
584.47k
333.12k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i9-11900H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4