| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900H vs i7-1260P


Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
906a3
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
41.94k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
26.81k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
12.63k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
13.51k (x0.79)
TOTAL
89.19k
94.9k (x1.06)

Multithread

i9-11900H

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
168.12k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
148.09k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
60.28k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
14.58k (x1.1)
TOTAL
584.47k
391.07k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i9-11900H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4