Core i9-11900H vs i9-11900K
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i9-11900K gets 788.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.3 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i9-11900K gets 788.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.3 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16386 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
106.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
788.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
38.06k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
31.54k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
13.5k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
23.3k (x1.37)
TOTAL
89.19k
106.41k (x1.19)
Multithread
i9-11900H
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
327.93k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
329.16k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
118.88k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.98k (x0.98)
TOTAL
584.47k
788.94k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
2623 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
2633 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
951 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
6312 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
7182 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
4397 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
20077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4