Core i7-1195G7 vs Xeon E5506
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 106.7 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 106.7 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
28 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
1.21k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
2.75k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
1.94k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
0.78k (x0.05)
TOTAL
46.75k
6.68k (x0.14)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
12.25k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
25.55k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
17.1k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
5.01k (x0.25)
TOTAL
106.66k
59.9k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
455 points/W
153 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1642 points/W
319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
995 points/W
214 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
717 points/W
63 points/W
TOTAL
3809 points/W
749 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
915 points/GHz
565 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3443 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2997 points/GHz
366 points/GHz
TOTAL
9349 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4