| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 4.9 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/28
TDP
28 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
35840 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
17.8k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
16.51k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
4.47k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
2.56k (x0.16)
TOTAL
82.77k
41.35k (x0.5)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
494.82k (x5.14)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
514.13k (x5.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
132.87k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
20.8k (x1.37)
TOTAL
239.58k
1162.63k (x4.85)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4