| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2021
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
1.97k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
8.15k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
2.37k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
4.84k (x0.32)
TOTAL
46.75k
17.32k (x0.37)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
15.73k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
64.78k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
18.06k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
5.21k (x0.26)
TOTAL
106.66k
103.77k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
12.92k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
10.97k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
2.54k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
5.09k (x0.32)
TOTAL
82.77k
31.52k (x0.38)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
103.33k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
87.67k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
20.1k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
4.91k (x0.32)
TOTAL
239.58k
216.02k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4