| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
906ec
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.17k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
21.15k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
7.01k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
15.32k (x1.02)
TOTAL
46.75k
48.66k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
38.45k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
155.68k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
51k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
18.26k (x0.91)
TOTAL
106.66k
263.38k (x2.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
33.62k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
30.02k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
7.17k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
15.43k (x0.99)
TOTAL
82.77k
86.24k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
248.93k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
224.43k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
53.39k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
18.54k (x1.22)
TOTAL
239.58k
545.3k (x2.28)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4