| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 3.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
35.87k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
31.43k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
7.34k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
15.73k (x1)
TOTAL
82.77k
90.37k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
377.56k (x3.92)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
347.59k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
88.08k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
12.24k (x0.81)
TOTAL
239.58k
825.47k (x3.45)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4