Core i7-1195G7 vs i7-8650U
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
806ea
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2021
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
21.61k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
19.69k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
4.61k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
9.95k (x0.63)
TOTAL
82.77k
55.86k (x0.67)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
78.38k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
72.02k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
16.95k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
6.15k (x0.4)
TOTAL
239.58k
173.49k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4