| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i7-7560U


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 2.5 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
806e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
97.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
3.56k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
12.71k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
3.93k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
8.89k (x0.59)
TOTAL
46.75k
29.09k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
6.34k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
29.51k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
8.94k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
14.72k (x0.73)
TOTAL
106.66k
59.51k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
19.37k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
17.26k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
3.78k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
7.75k (x0.5)
TOTAL
82.77k
48.16k (x0.58)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
39.17k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
38.24k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
8.9k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
10.97k (x0.72)
TOTAL
239.58k
97.27k (x0.41)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4