Core i7-1195G7 vs i5-8300H
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
23.6k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
21.72k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
4.61k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
6.8k (x0.43)
TOTAL
82.77k
56.72k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
79.12k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
81.27k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
17.46k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
4.62k (x0.3)
TOTAL
239.58k
182.47k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4