| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
3.41k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
14.14k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
4.41k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
8.87k (x0.59)
TOTAL
46.75k
30.83k (x0.66)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
12.75k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
52.88k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
16.25k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
8.98k (x0.45)
TOTAL
106.66k
90.85k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
21.65k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
19.18k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
4.38k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
8.3k (x0.53)
TOTAL
82.77k
53.51k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
77.12k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
68.68k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
15.24k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
7.78k (x0.51)
TOTAL
239.58k
168.81k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4