| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i5-10600K


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
352.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
30.11k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
26.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
6.01k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
10.77k (x0.69)
TOTAL
82.77k
73.05k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
158.82k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
150.39k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
36.56k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
7.11k (x0.47)
TOTAL
239.58k
352.88k (x1.47)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4