| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
May 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
28.39k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
24.89k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.78k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
13.19k (x0.84)
TOTAL
82.77k
72.25k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
180.2k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
163.51k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
40.6k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
6.48k (x0.43)
TOTAL
239.58k
390.78k (x1.63)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4