| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
4.3k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
16.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
5.25k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
12.61k (x0.84)
TOTAL
46.75k
38.72k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
18.1k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
79.16k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
26.75k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
13.81k (x0.69)
TOTAL
106.66k
137.82k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
26.28k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
23.38k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.52k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
12.96k (x0.83)
TOTAL
82.77k
68.14k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
163.67k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
159.74k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
39k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
7.56k (x0.5)
TOTAL
239.58k
369.97k (x1.54)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4