Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
16.59k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
23.51k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
9.38k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
7.98k (x0.51)
TOTAL
82.77k
57.47k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
152.43k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
195.79k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
83.2k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
5.38k (x0.35)
TOTAL
239.58k
436.8k (x1.82)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4