| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
800f11
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
372.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
13.72k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
22.48k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.12k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
15.44k (x0.99)
TOTAL
82.77k
56.76k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
110.92k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
200.56k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
54.24k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
7.01k (x0.46)
TOTAL
239.58k
372.73k (x1.56)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4