| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
4.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
17.36k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
7.5k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
23.79k (x1.59)
TOTAL
46.75k
52.85k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
22.11k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
108.04k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
56.81k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
36.39k (x1.81)
TOTAL
106.66k
223.36k (x2.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
16.04k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
24.47k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
8.38k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
21.66k (x1.38)
TOTAL
82.77k
70.55k (x0.85)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
113.63k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
143.55k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
63.84k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
27.34k (x1.8)
TOTAL
239.58k
348.35k (x1.45)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4