Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
14.58k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
23.98k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.35k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
6.34k (x0.4)
TOTAL
82.77k
50.25k (x0.61)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
57.37k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
107.03k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
28.9k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
7.05k (x0.46)
TOTAL
239.58k
200.34k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4