| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
3.8k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
17.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
5.17k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
3.16k (x0.21)
TOTAL
46.75k
29.52k (x0.63)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
15.28k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
76.44k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
27.48k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
3.02k (x0.15)
TOTAL
106.66k
122.2k (x1.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
14.2k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
23.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.35k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
5.18k (x0.33)
TOTAL
82.77k
47.96k (x0.58)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
58.24k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
105.72k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
28.73k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
5.59k (x0.37)
TOTAL
239.58k
198.27k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4