| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 106.7 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
100fa0
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2021
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
1.98k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
4.57k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
2.57k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
3.51k (x0.23)
TOTAL
46.75k
12.64k (x0.27)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
11.86k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
27.4k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
15.39k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
3.46k (x0.17)
TOTAL
106.66k
58.11k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
455 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1642 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
995 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
717 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
3809 points/W
612 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
915 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3443 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2997 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
9349 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4