Core i7-1185G7 vs i7-7560U
Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
806e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
97.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
19.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
17.26k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
3.78k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
7.75k (x0.99)
TOTAL
60.87k
48.16k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-1185G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
39.17k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
38.24k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
8.9k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
10.97k (x1.17)
TOTAL
230.91k
97.27k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i7-1185G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
6485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4